Manchester United v Liverpool - Match Preview

In around 24 hours from now, Liverpool FC arrive at Old Trafford with the intention of tightening their grip on fourth place and at the same time, inflicting more misery on David Moyes Manchester United side in a season that has seen the balance of power between the two clubs swing firmly toward the Reds of Merseyside. Brendan Rodgers' men will have to be at their very best in a game that ranks 

Lucas Leiva: Key man for LFC

alongside Barcelona - Real Madrid; Borussia Dortmund - Bayern Munich, and AC and Inter Milan teams in being some of the most hotly contested rivalries in world football. 

Liverpool have good news going into the match with Lucas Leiva and Mamadou Sakho returning from injury and available for selection, leaving Jose Enrique as the only player retaining the proverbial Sicknote. The choice of midfielders at Rodgers' disposal; Leiva, Steven Gerrard, Jordan Henderson, Philippe Coutinho and Joe Allen translates to a fully fit first choice midfield plus Victor Moses and Luis Alberto. In terms of formation, I'd like to see both Gerrard and Lucas playing in front of the back four - which should perhaps include Sakho in place of Daniel Agger - with Henderson or Allen in front of them and behind an attacking trio of Daniel Sturridge, Luis Suarez and Raheem Sterling. The benefit of Lucas' return is that it will give Gerrard some more freedom to advance in midfield and put through balls in to the runs of breaking attackers. In any case the choice of personnel  leaves the Gaffer with the nightmare many of his peers could only dream of having!

United will no doubt have Marouane Fellaini continue in midfield following his performances in the last two games for them. The absence of his physical presence, eye for a pass and undoubted skill has left the Red Devils wanting in the middle of the park for much of the season. Other than Fellaini, Michael Carrick, Juan Mata, Wayne Rooney and of course Robin Van Persie, don't give United have enough for Liverpool to fear. Having said that, this is still for the most part, the team that won the league last season. As such, Liverpool have a very tough afternoon's work ahead of them if they wish to come away from Old Trafford with anything, let alone three points. 

Tactically, I believe Liverpool will continue with their high pressing, counter-attacking approach and deny the home side any time on the ball. Interestingly, Liverpool have made the fewest crosses (410) in the Premiership of all the top ten teams with the exception of Everton (392). Manchester United on the other hand have made the most (692) and this is a very telling stat. It follows that David Moyes' tactics are perhaps outmoded given the season they've had. I for one, don't believe this is a coincidence. It's clear to me that playing a high pressure, counter-attacking game with through balls to fast attackers - allied to possession football, is an infinitely more effective approach than simply getting crosses in from the flanks. Liverpool have shown this to devastating effect against their neighbours Everton and Arsenal among others this season, so go figure. 

One cannot ignore the fact however, that this fixture is as good as a derby due to the relative close proximity of the sides and the unrivalled history between them. Arsenal - Tottenham Hotspurs; Newcastle United - Sunderland; Swansea and Cardiff Cities; Chelsea - Fulham. All great rivalries, great clubs in their own rights but no disrespect to them, meetings between these teams don't capture the imagination quite like Manchester United versus Liverpool. The two from North London perhaps, but there's still something missing. Some history, some achievement some thing that goes just a little further than bragging rights and this is what makes this match such a tough one to call. On paper and current form, you'd expect the Merseysiders to come out on top and quite rightly so but the games are always such tight, emotional affairs that anything can happen on the day. 

Liverpool haven't won at Old Trafford for about five years now. However like many a Liverpool fan, I have faith in Brendan Rodgers. He's the man to take the team forward and I've believed as much since he took over. I don't make predictions but I'm suggesting a win for Liverpool. The manager has taken the team to a new level. A higher, more modern and effective level. Above that being occupied by Moyes' men. It's my belief that Moyes needs to overhaul his thinking, his approach, his game plan if he wishes to follow in the massive footsteps of Sir Alex Ferguson. For me, I can wait for that. Take your time David. No rush!

Follow me on Twitter: @Mrbengreen

Is Sol Campbell a victim of racism or himself?

Sol Campbell... Is it cos 'e is Black?

It's not often I find myself writing for four consecutive days in a row. Not just because there is a limit to my considerable literary prowess, but it's also possible that one can over-egg the cake. However, yesterday morning I saw the interview on TV where Sol Campbell claimed he'd have been England captain for "...10 years had he been white...". Intriguing. 

I mentioned this to a Journalist and broadcaster and during our discussion, he alerted me to the Dispatches program on Channel 4 last night that was addressing the perennial issue of racism, homophobia and anti-semitism at football grounds. It was sad, but alas not surprising to see, that despite the efforts of the authorities, the disease of bigotry is still evident in football. I was also disappointed - but not surprised - by Jason Roberts' revelation that he was racially abused on a regular basis by opposing fans, and worse still, by his own "supporters". What I noticed was that the perpetrators were from the same clubs that have had long histories of hooligan, prejudiced, abusive and disorderly followers. These being among others, Millwall, West Ham and those from across the park, Everton where a few of there own were shown being particularly insulting about Daniel Sturridge. 

Ultimately, it's clear that abuse in football stems from society as a whole. Racism in football per se is a falsehood. Harsh, but true. And as such, it is everybody's responsibility to do something about it. If we think the FA, UEFA or whoever alone can stamp out this unsavoury facet of the beautiful game, then we're very sadly mistaken. Having said that, I do believe the Police can also do more. During the programme yesterday, there were Police officers standing beside fans (I use the term very loosely - perhaps scum would be more appropriate) who were hurling verbal abuse at Brighton, Leicester City and Tottenham supporters at various matches. The reaction of the police, on each occasion... Sweet FA, if you excuse the pun. 

To rid the game of these ills, football must not be seen as a separate issue. Yes have the Kick it Out campaign and other initiatives, but they should be aligned with the wider society. If the culprits were brought to book and exposed, I'm sure we'll find the guilty are from all walks of life. From Accountants to Stockbrokers, to Bricklayers and Plumbers. I disagree that the football ground should be seen as being apart from the street in terms of law enforcement. A football pitch is the public in my opinion and if the club or the FA don't, or can't do anything about a particular event, then the police should. An incident should be treated in the same way as if it were in the street, in a train, shop or wherever. To continue with this distinction, or waiting for one to "launch an investigation" before the other can act is just lame. The fact is the FA and the club can only do so much. The rest of us, supporters, the general public and police must do the rest in partnership and between us all, we can make a difference. 

Going back to Campbell, I really don't agree with him and where he's coming from. Paul Ince was England captain, and for a vital world cup qualifier at that. Albeit due to an injury, I think the fact that he was chosen by Glenn Hoddle confirms the faith in, and high regard in which Hoddle held for, Ince. For Campbell to say he would have been captain for 10 years is almost laughable. He'd have been the only player, if memory serves me right, let alone black player to serve that length of time. It's probably more true to the point that a number of reasons contributed to his not being selected more often as captain. More suitable teammates, PR and most importantly, his own attitude. 

Personally, I think Sol Campbell was a good solid player. Reliable. Commanding. Strong. He has also fought tirelessly against racism in football, and in fairness to him addressed head on the problems facing inner city black youth with crime, unemployment and such and asserted that many of the victims were their own worst enemies. Could it be here that he is being his own worst enemy? I'm a black man. I've been so for longer than Sol Campbell and, as an ordinary bloke, I've not had the same privilege and protection perhaps, as has been afforded to him. However, what I can say is that in order to get on in society, be you Black, White, Asian, Marsian no matter what it's absolutely vital that you have the right Attitude. This is absolutely key. Abundantly clear. The right attitude enables everybody to see each other for who or what they are without putting colour, religion, sexuality or other first and to act and be perceived as an equal. My opinion is that Sol's attitude has gone before him where selection as captain is concerned. It may even be that he's trying to do the very same thing that may have prevented him from becoming captain during his career. Some good solid PR. After all, he does have a biography to promote and what better card to play... Than the Ace of Race!

Sol Campbell has been quoted as saying he may have to leave the country to further his management ambitions. If he does that would be a great shame but all in all, the strongest and fittest survive. Not just physically, but in attitude also. 

Follow me on Twitter: @ Mrbengreen